- Investing Insights
- Posts
- Adyen - (ADYEY)
Adyen - (ADYEY)
Accumulating Advantages
Adyen: The Quiet Toll Booth of Payments
“When you have a business and you want to actually keep that business (not just exit it), your decisions start to drastically change.”
-Adyen CEO Pieter van der Does
If you’ve ever shopped online, there’s a good chance you’ve interacted with Adyen—perhaps without even knowing it. That’s part of what makes this company so interesting: Adyen is essentially the “invisible engine” that helps big-name merchants, from Spotify to Uber, route payments effortlessly behind the scenes. It’s not a flashy consumer brand like Stripe or Square, but it’s arguably just as fundamental to the modern digital economy.
The Business
Adyen is a Netherlands-based payment service provider (PSP) that allows businesses to accept a variety of payment methods—credit cards, mobile wallets, bank transfers, and local options—across multiple channels and geographies. But what sets Adyen apart is not merely the breadth of payment types. Rather, it’s their single, unified tech stack, which reduces the patchwork complexity that merchants often face. It’s like Adyen took the mess of wires that used to define payment acceptance—dozens of local processors, unpredictable settlement times, a labyrinth of compliance protocols—and replaced it all with a simplified, end-to-end platform that just works.
The core value proposition is straightforward: one partner, one contract, one integration. If you’ve run a global e-commerce business, you know the pains of dealing with legacy payment gateways, middlemen, and banks in different regions. Adyen’s approach cures that headache. Everything from reconciliation and fraud detection to currency conversions is neatly bundled, which means less overhead, fewer operational bottlenecks, and more direct data insights for the merchant.
The Tech
Adyen’s technology advantage has historically stemmed from a single code base. Instead of a hodgepodge of systems acquired over time (a challenge faced by many competitors who grew through M&A), Adyen built its platform from scratch—solving modern payment problems with modern architecture. That means:
Data in One Place: All transactions run through the same core, allowing businesses to see exactly where payments succeed or fail, track consumer behaviors, and tailor fraud checks more intelligently.
Scalability and Reliability: Adyen is known for its uptime and minimal downtime. For big merchants—where every minute of downtime means lost sales—this stability is worth its weight in gold.
Seamless Feature Rollouts: Because Adyen runs on a single platform, new features and upgrades reach customers globally without compatibility nightmares.
This technological coherency creates a subtle but powerful moat. In an industry whose backbone is often antiquated, Adyen doesn’t have to juggle half-a-dozen legacy stacks to stay innovative.
A Financial Powerhouse Beneath the Surface
One of the highlights in Adyen’s financials is its consistently high net revenue growth coupled with strong profitability metrics. Part of this is the inherent nature of the payments business: as e-commerce and digital payments swell globally, Adyen stands to capture more transaction volume and corresponding fees.
But it’s not just riding an upward tide—it’s also running a lean ship. The company’s efficient go-to-market strategy focuses on serving the largest global merchants first. This yields a few key benefits:
High Processing Volume: Big-name merchants process thousands of transactions per second. Once Adyen wins a major client, that single relationship can lift overall volumes dramatically.
Brand Halo & Word-of-Mouth: Serving marquee brands enhances credibility. It’s easier to win over the next client when you can say your existing customers include Netflix, Nike, or Microsoft.
Better Unit Economics: Large clients might negotiate more favorable fees, but the enormous volume can offset narrower take rates, delivering profitable scale.
All this supports a robust margin profile. Adyen’s EBITDA margins, some of the best in fintech, are impressively steady given its rapid reinvestment in R&D, international expansion, and customer support. Management’s discipline—“we don’t do flashy marketing, we focus on product”—helps keep overhead modest.
The Edge: Acquisition oriented, but not through M&A
A subtle yet significant differentiator in Adyen’s model is its decision to acquire BINs (Bank Identification Numbers) outright, rather than merely renting or partnering with third-party banks. In simplest terms, a BIN is the first six digits of a card number—it tells payment networks which bank or processor is associated with the transaction. By owning BINs, Adyen becomes the direct acquirer in more regions, giving it tighter control over the entire payment flow. This leads to fewer intermediaries, enhanced data visibility, and often better interchange economics. In practice, it means that when someone uses a credit or debit card, Adyen can directly “speak” to the networks (Visa, Mastercard, etc.) instead of relying on a patchwork of banking partners. For large merchants, this streamlines reconciliations, reduces latency, and can even lower costs. In 2023, Adyen acquired branch licenses in the UK and in Brazil. In the first half of 2024, they obtained a license to operate in Mexico, which enabled them to do business with Ikea Mexico.
For comparison, Stripe typically rents BINs through partnerships. While this arrangement helps Stripe move quickly and expand globally, it can introduce extra layers of complexity. Rented BINs often depend on third-party banks’ risk profiles and compliance rules, which limit how nimbly Stripe can customize features or reduce fees over the long run. By acquiring BINs, Adyen is effectively investing in infrastructure, accumulating advantages, and strengthening its moat, even though this approach demands more capital and rigorous licensing processes. Over time, that deeper integration with card networks may enable more flexibility in pricing and product innovation—an advantage that can matter greatly to enterprise-level clients looking for maximum control over their payment strategy. Ultimately, buying these banking licenses creates a snowball effect for Adyen over time, accumulating advantages for the long run. Adyen is not interested in quarter to quarter or year over year gyrations. They are taking a long term view that will enable them to lead payments for decades.
Adyen’s story is similar to how Xero grew to challenge QuickBooks. Xero sought to build a modern, cloud-first accounting system from the ground up. This Australian company took on Intuit with beautiful code and UI. Now Xero is a formidable competitor to Intuit in the bookkeeping software space. Like Xero, Adyen was born with a single, streamlined tech stack that’s natively built for global commerce. You will not see mergers and acquisitions in it's DNA to further complicate their existing tech stack. Established players often have legacy architecture and multiple acquired platforms duct-taped together, creating complexity for both them and their customers. Just as Xero’s simplicity and user-friendly interface appeal to small businesses worldwide, Adyen’s all-in-one payment gateway and acquiring model appeal to large merchants tired of juggling multiple systems.
Xero and Adyen aim to be truly international rather than retrofitting U.S.-centric platforms for foreign markets. Xero did this by entering the U.K., Australia, and beyond with localized features, rapidly becoming a global contender. Likewise, Adyen’s acquisition and ownership of BINs around the world—and integration with local payment methods—make it a default choice for companies that need frictionless, cross-border commerce. The upshot is that both Xero and Adyen leverage a lean, modern platform to challenge much bigger, entrenched competitors in spaces traditionally plagued by patchwork solutions.
Competitive Landscape: Stripe, PayPal, and Beyond
The payments space is a big pond with some fearsome fish. Companies like Stripe and PayPal often grab headlines, but Adyen emerged comfortably in the top tier. Stripe’s developer-centric approach, for instance, is favored by smaller or mid-sized companies that need a quick, developer-friendly solution. PayPal remains the brand of choice for one-click consumer checkouts (especially in the West). Braintree (owned by PayPal) also competes for enterprise merchants.
Yet, Adyen’s sweet spot—serving large, global enterprises with sophisticated needs—differentiates it from most payment providers. Where Stripe emphasizes developer tools, Adyen emphasizes operational simplicity at scale. This nuance in target clientele means they all can coexist. Indeed, many businesses end up using multiple processors across different verticals or geographies, but a growing number of them eventually want to unify their payments for better data and cost savings. That’s where Adyen typically wins.
Where’s the Growth?
Looking ahead, Adyen’s growth strategy has a few clear pillars:
International Expansion: While Adyen is already a global firm, there’s still plenty of runway, especially in emerging markets where digital payments are ramping up. Adyen’s ability to integrate local payment methods like India’s UPI or Brazil’s Boleto is a potent draw for international merchants.
In-Person Payments: Adyen has expanded into omnichannel capabilities—think point-of-sale terminals in physical stores. As retailers unify their online and offline strategies, Adyen stands ready to process payments on both fronts, giving them a consistent data stream for better loyalty programs, inventory management, and fraud detection.
Deeper Software Integrations: Large merchants increasingly want payment functionality embedded in their broader tech ecosystems—shopping carts, subscription billing, ERP platforms, etc. Adyen is forging more partnerships with software vendors, making it easier for any enterprise to integrate payments seamlessly.
Adyen categorizes their three major revenue streams in their financial reports:
o Digital: Ecommerce and subscription business online
o Unified Commerce: Think Nike: Retail online and offline in store with point-of-sale systems
o Platforms: Fasted growing (up 44% in 2024 vs 2023). Think Etsy and Ebay
Below is a high-level comparison of Adyen’s and Stripe’s financial performance over roughly the last five years. Because Stripe is private, its exact financials aren’t publicly disclosed. Most of Stripe’s figures below come from media reports and industry estimates, whereas Adyen’s data comes from the company’s published annual results (all in EUR for consistency, though Stripe typically reports in USD).
Important Note: Stripe’s “revenue” numbers in media can sometimes refer to net revenue (akin to Adyen’s definition) and other times to total payment volume or gross revenue. Stripe also invests heavily in growth, so its profitability metrics (EBITDA, gross margins) are harder to pin down. The figures below are approximate, based on best-available information
Adyen vs. Stripe: EBITDA & Revenue
Adyen (Publicly Reported)
Year | Net Revenue | EBITDA Margin |
2018 | €349M | ~52% |
2019 | €498M | ~56% |
2020 | €684M | ~59% |
2021 | €1.00B | ~63% |
2022 | €1.31B | ~59–60% (1) |
2023 | €1.63B | ~46% (increased headcount) |
Adyen’s EBITDA margin dipped slightly in 2022 as the company accelerated hiring and other investments.
Stripe (Estimates / Media Reports)
Year | Estimated Net Revenue | EBITDA Margin |
2018 | ~$1.5B – 1.6B | Low double digits? |
2019 | ~$2.0B – 2.5B | Low double digits? |
2020 | ~$3.0B – 3.5B (2) | Possibly near breakeven |
2021 | ~$5.0B – 7.0B (3) | Unknown |
2022 | ~$7.0B – 9.0B (4) | Unknown |
Stripe’s revenue accelerated during COVID, likely above prior years, but exact figures are speculative.
Some sources reported Stripe’s gross revenue (total fees) at over $12B in 2021, but net revenue is lower.
In 2023, some media estimates suggested Stripe hit a ~$14B run rate. Again, the line between “gross” and “net” is often blurred.
Key Observations on EBITDA
Adyen: Maintains robust EBITDA margins (50–60%+), reflecting disciplined cost structure and a single-platform model.
Stripe: Appears to favor aggressive reinvestment in product and market expansion, likely keeping EBITDA margins much lower—possibly in the low double digits or even near breakeven in some years.
Adyen vs. Stripe: Approximate Year-over-Year Revenue Growth
Year | Adyen YoY Growth | Stripe YoY Growth (est.) |
2018 | ~61% (349M vs. 218M) | 40–60% range (depending on base) |
2019 | ~43% (498M vs. 349M) | ~25–50% (uncertain estimates) |
2020 | ~38% (684M vs. 498M) | Possibly 50–80% (COVID-driven surge) |
2021 | ~46% (1.00B vs. 684M) | 50–100% (widely reported hyper-growth) |
2022 | ~33% (1.31B vs. 1.00B) | Slowing from peak COVID levels, but still robust (maybe ~40–50%) |
Adyen’s Revenue Growth: Consistent and strong, typically in the 30–60% range annually. Adyen emphasizes controlled scaling and sustained profitability.
Stripe’s Revenue Growth: Thought to be higher in certain years, particularly during 2020–2021, but exact figures remain speculative.
Bottom Line
Profitability: Adyen stands out for its high EBITDA margins, resulting from focused product development and an efficient single-platform approach. Stripe’s EBITDA margins are lower, reflecting a strategy of rapid reinvestment for growth.
Growth: Both companies have grown quickly, driven by the global expansion of digital commerce. Stripe may have grown faster overall, but Adyen’s combination of healthy growth and industry-leading profitability is quite notable.
Again, please note the uncertainties around Stripe’s numbers since it’s a private company. For Adyen, audited reports confirm the consistently high EBITDA margins and steady growth trajectory.
Strategic Risks and Considerations
No company is immune to competitive or macroeconomic pressures:
Compressed Take Rates: As more payment solutions vie for merchants, the fees that processors can charge may face downward pressure. Adyen’s volume-based approach helps mitigate this, but margin erosion is always a possibility in the long run.
Regulation: Payment providers operate at the intersection of finance and technology—both heavily regulated fields. Changes in EU, US, or global regulations (e.g., PSD2 in Europe) can affect Adyen’s compliance costs and product roadmap.
Client Concentration: While Adyen serves a roster of global giants, losing one or two big clients can meaningfully dent volumes. Historically, churn is low, but it’s something to watch.
Final Take: A Long-Term Compounder?
Adyen is not the loudest name in fintech, but its consistent focus, high-caliber tech, and enterprise relationships position it as a long-term winner. It’s a story about simplicity in a complex market. By providing a single, fully integrated payment platform that scales effortlessly across geographies and channels, Adyen has managed to carve out a durable niche in an industry where competition (and potential commoditization) abounds.
Yes, growth may ebb and flow with consumer spending cycles, and any shift in enterprise loyalty can be a risk. But if you believe e-commerce’s global expansion and the inevitability of digitized payments—across online and in-person—then Adyen is neatly positioned at the intersection of those rising currents.
Could the stock be volatile? Absolutely—fintech has never been a stable ride. But over a multi-year horizon, Adyen’s fundamental strengths (product quality, brand trust, global footprint, single-platform advantage) should continue to spin the flywheel for both top and bottom-line growth. If you’re looking for a company that quietly helps keep the world of commerce humming, it’s hard not to give Adyen a nod of respect—and perhaps a spot on your watchlist.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as investment advice. Always do your own research or consult a licensed professional before making investment decisions.